The Heart of AI Governance – Society and Stakeholders

A body may have a strong brain, sturdy skeleton, and powerful muscles, but without a heart it cannot live. The heart circulates oxygen and sustains every part of the organism. In corporate governance, the heart is society and stakeholders: customers, employees, regulators, communities, investors, and the public at large.

AI can strengthen the body, but only if the heart continues to beat. If stakeholders lose trust, no regulation, process, or technical safeguard can sustain legitimacy. The social license to operate — permission granted not by law but by society — depends on whether AI is perceived as fair, transparent, and aligned with human values.

Metaphor – The Heart as Circulation and Legitimacy

The heart provides circulation: oxygen to muscles, nutrients to tissues, waste removed through veins. For AI governance, the heart provides legitimacy: trust flows outward to stakeholders, feedback flows inward to organizations.

If circulation is blocked, organs fail. If legitimacy is lost, business models collapse. Governance is the discipline of keeping the heart pumping steadily, ensuring every part of the organization is connected to society and stakeholders.

Case Study 1 – Facebook (Meta) and the Collapse of Trust

Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal showed what happens when the heart stops. Data misuse eroded user trust, regulators intervened, and advertisers fled. The skeleton (systems) and brain (leadership) remained intact, but without legitimacy the platform faced reputational cardiac arrest.

Lesson: when the heart fails, the body falters. Governance must treat stakeholder trust as vital circulation, not optional reputation management.

Read more on the Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal from the Guardian – Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach.

Case Study 2 – Philips and Responsible Health Tech

Philips presents the opposite example. By positioning itself around health technology and ESG goals, Philips deliberately aligns AI and data initiatives with societal needs: improving patient outcomes, enabling remote care, and reducing environmental impact.

The company invests in stakeholder engagement: patient groups, regulators, hospitals, and employees all contribute feedback. The result is a governance model where the heart beats visibly: legitimacy circulates through transparency reports, ESG disclosures, and active dialogue.

Lesson: a healthy heart pumps both ways. Companies must listen as much as they speak, integrating stakeholder input into decision-making.

Case Study 3 – Maersk and Cyberattack Transparency

When Maersk suffered a massive cyberattack, it chose transparency. Instead of concealing the breach, it informed customers and stakeholders promptly, explaining the risks and recovery process.

This transparency preserved legitimacy: customers saw a company acting responsibly under stress. The muscles and skeleton bent but did not break, because the heart continued to circulate trust.

Read further in the News section of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) the following – Implementing the Lessons Learned From Maersk’s Major Cyberattack

Case Study 4 – Patagonia and Purpose-Driven AI

Patagonia (an American outdoor apparel company is known for its focus on high-quality, sustainable products, and a strong commitment to environmental activism and responsibility) uses technology selectively, aligning it with its mission to protect the environment. AI supports supply chain transparency and sustainability reporting, but always framed as part of a wider social duty.

Here the heart sets the rhythm: profit is important, but legitimacy flows from environmental stewardship. For boards, this shows how governance can hardwire purpose into AI choices, preventing drift into purely commercial exploitation.

Read an article in Forbes – Why Customers Pay More For Brands With Purpose: The Patagonia Model.

Case Study 5 – Unilever and Stakeholder Dialogue

Unilever’s governance model emphasizes multi-stakeholder dialogue: consumers, employees, NGOs, and regulators. AI projects (e.g. consumer analytics, sustainability reporting) are explicitly assessed for societal impact.

This shows that the heart must not only beat internally but also listen externally. Stakeholders act as both veins and arteries: they provide legitimacy and demand accountability.

Read the Communication on progress 2020 issued by the United Nations were Unilever was qualified for the Global Compact Advanced level. Starting in 2023, the Global Compact has revised the COP mechanism (with a standardized questionnaire) and phased out some distinctions in levels. The policy may not maintain “Advanced” as a permanent label. Their current publicly listed status is Active, not explicitly “Advanced”

Case Study 6 – Tesla and the Fragile Pulse of Reputation

Tesla demonstrates both the power and fragility of stakeholder trust. Innovation in autonomous driving attracted admiration, but repeated accidents involving Autopilot eroded confidence. Regulators, customers, and the public began questioning whether speed had overtaken responsibility.

Lesson: the heart is sensitive. Reputational shocks can change stakeholder circulation overnight. Governance must prepare for crises by embedding transparency and responsiveness.

Read more on the BBC – Tesla found partly to blame for fatal Autopilot crash.

The Heartbeat of Governance – Dialogue and Disclosure

The heart beats through two main mechanisms:

Dialogue. Stakeholders must be engaged regularly and sincerely. This means not only investor calls, but community forums, employee surveys, patient councils, and NGO partnerships.
Disclosure. Trust requires light. Transparent reporting — whether CSRD sustainability disclosures, IFRS financial statements, or AI ethics reports — ensures that circulation is visible.

Dialogue is the pulse; disclosure is the EKG. Together they make the heartbeat measurable, trackable, and real.

Read more on Disclosure in IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements.

Regulation and Responsibility – The Pacemaker of the Heart

Armor protects, but the heart sometimes needs a pacemaker. Regulation sets minimum beats per minute: disclosures required by CSRD, protections mandated by GDPR, fairness principles in King IV. Responsibility ensures the rhythm is steady, not just legal.

Boards act as cardiologists: monitoring the pulse of legitimacy, ensuring the heart does not beat erratically. Whistleblower channels, stakeholder committees, and independent audits are the stents and valves that keep blood flowing.

Read more in the blog on Regulation and Responsibility.

Society and Stakeholders – What the Heart Means for Governance

A body cannot survive without a heart. It is the steady pulse that keeps every organ supplied with oxygen and energy. In the same way, organizations cannot survive without the trust and acceptance of society and stakeholders. Laws may permit, technology may enable, but without legitimacy flowing through the veins of the enterprise, the body falters.

The heart of governance is stakeholder trust. Customers, employees, regulators, investors, and communities grant the social license to operate. This legitimacy is not bought once; it must be earned continuously through transparency, dialogue, and responsible behaviour. Just as a weak pulse affects every organ, a failure of trust affects every part of the business — from investor confidence to customer loyalty.

Stakeholders are not a burden; they are circulation. They provide oxygen in the form of loyalty, investment, and goodwill. They also remove waste by holding companies accountable, pointing out flaws, and demanding correction. In this sense, governance is cardiology: keeping the heart healthy by monitoring the pulse of society, listening to its rhythms, and intervening when irregularities appear.

What This Means in Practice

Legitimacy is as vital as profit. Boards must treat stakeholder trust not as a “soft issue” but as a core asset. Without legitimacy, revenue streams dry up, regulators intervene, and reputations collapse.
Dialogue is circulation. Two-way communication — not press releases but genuine engagement — is how the heart pumps. Advisory councils, employee forums, and community partnerships make circulation tangible.
Disclosure is the heartbeat made visible. Reports under CSRD, IFRS, or ESG standards are like an EKG: they allow stakeholders to see and measure the rhythm of responsibility. Transparency converts promises into credibility.
Purpose sets the rhythm. Companies with clear, authentic purpose maintain a steadier pulse. Stakeholders recognize when actions align with values, and when they do not. Governance must ensure that purpose and practice remain aligned.
Crisis requires resuscitation. Just as cardiologists respond quickly to cardiac arrest, boards must act decisively in reputational crises. Openness, accountability, and rapid corrective action are the defibrillators of governance.

The heart is not idealism but realism. Organizations that lose stakeholder trust do not merely suffer reputationally; they lose customers, capital, and survival. But organizations that treat society and stakeholders as their heart gain resilience: the circulation of legitimacy sustains them even through shocks.

Global Governance Lessons

The heart sustains the body: stakeholder trust is non-negotiable.
Transparency and dialogue are circulation, not PR.
Regulation provides the pacemaker, but responsibility keeps the rhythm.
Crisis management must prioritize legitimacy first, efficiency second.
Purpose-driven companies sustain healthier pulses.
Governance must adapt the heartbeat to global stakeholder expectations.

FAQs – The Heart of AI Governance

Why describe society and stakeholders as the heart of governance?

Because they circulate legitimacy, just as the heart circulates blood.

Without stakeholder trust, organizations cannot survive, however strong their systems.

The metaphor reminds boards that legitimacy is as vital as profit.

What happens when the heart of governance fails?

Reputational scandals, loss of customer trust, or regulatory intervention are equivalent to cardiac arrest.

Facebook and Tesla show how quickly circulation can collapse.

Recovery requires transparency, dialogue, and accountability.

How can companies keep the heart healthy?

By maintaining open dialogue with stakeholders and disclosing performance honestly.

Reports, forums, and surveys act as regular health checks.

A healthy heart beats steadily when feedback is welcomed and acted upon.

Why is disclosure compared to an EKG?

Because it makes the heartbeat visible.

CSRD, IFRS, and ESG reports show stakeholders how the organization circulates value and manages risks.

Without disclosure, stakeholders cannot measure trust.

What role do boards play in protecting the heart?

Boards are the cardiologists of governance.

They monitor the pulse of legitimacy, ensure stakeholder voices are heard, and intervene when circulation weakens.

Their duty is to keep rhythm steady across crises.

How do global differences affect the governance heartbeat?

Expectations differ across regions: in Europe the emphasis lies on ESG and sustainability disclosure, in the US litigation risk and shareholder rights dominate, while in emerging markets employment, inclusivity, and social fairness are often paramount.

Governance must adapt its rhythm to these local pulses, while ensuring the organization still beats with one coherent heart.

The most effective boards approach this not as a patchwork of compliance, but as a principle-driven philosophy that treats fairness, accountability, and transparency as universal duties.

This way, local adaptation strengthens rather than fragments legitimacy.

AI Governance Society and Stakeholders

AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders AI Governance Society and Stakeholders